Resources
Recent Articles
Articles RSS Feed
| Subscribe to Feed |
Articles by Email
Receive email alerts when new articles are added to our site.
| A Biblical Screening of Jim Cymbala’s Book, 'Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire' |
|
|
| Written by Gary Gilley |
|
(December 1998 - Volume 4, Issue 11) The motivation behind reading this book was both a rave review from an IFCA (Independent Fundamental Churches of America) communiqué (written by Steve Johnson, member of the publication committee), which was also published by the IFCA bulletin service; and an equally positive book review in Voice (the IFCA magazine) by Richard McCarrell. I will quote McCarrell’s review in total, for context:
Surprised by the endorsement of a charismatic minister by the IFCA I quickly ordered the book hoping to discover why. (For evidence of Cymbala’s charismatic associations see Charisma Magazine, December 1998, which identifies him as a keynote speaker for a conference on Pentecostal Prophecy and Power in Springfield, Missouri on March 8-10, 1999). As promised there was much to commend: Cymbala, pastor of the huge Brooklyn Tabernacle, best known for its choir, places great emphasis on prayer, one of the truly missing commodities in our lives and churches today. He is not deceived by the gimmicks of the church growth movement. He is dismayed at Christian commercialism, especially in the area of music. He is bothered by the extreme forms of the Spiritual Warfare movement, although he does not completely divorce himself from it. He believes that God is willing and able to do a great work in the lives of His people. These are refreshing and needed admonishments. On the Other Hand, There is Much to Concern Us Calling the Spirit Down Cymbala takes a clearly charismatic position on the ministry of the Holy Spirit. "The Spirit of God came down upon us" (p.18). "People began to sense the presence of the Lord in that humble place" (p.31). "I felt the Spirit nudging me" (p.128). In a complaint about ordered church services Cymbala states, "A basic sign of revival is that the wind is allowed to blow where it will. . . . Are church members encouraging their pastors to act on the Lord’s prompting no matter the cost?" (p.134) Quoting positively a friend of Charles Finney, "I am now convinced, it is my duty and privilege, and the duty of every other Christian, to pray for as much of the Holy Spirit as came down on the day of Pentecost, and a great deal more" (p.176). Reviewer’s Comment: The "coming down of the Holy Spirit" and "feeling His presence," etc. are not New Testament teachings. The Holy Spirit has already come, and we already possess all of the Holy Spirit that is available. Besides, how could we know when we "feel" His presence? To pray for the Holy Spirit to come down as at Pentecost, is a gross misunderstanding both of the purpose of Pentecost and of the present ministry of the Holy Spirit. Revelation in the Inner Spirit Cymbala supports the increasingly accepted view that one can hear from God in the inner spirit. "I sensed God speaking. . . . I knew I had heard from God. . . . His word to me was. . ." (p.25). "Brothers and sisters, I really feel that I’ve heard from God about the future of our church" (p.27). "The Holy Spirit stopped me. ‘No!’ a voice seemed to say. ‘Fight for him! Cry out to me!’" "The Holy Spirit spoke to one of the choir members" (p.103). "As I spoke, the Holy Spirit seemed to prompt me to add" (p.160). Of course what God had to say to Cymbala was what every pastor would love to hear, "If you and your wife will lead my people to pray and call upon my name, you will never lack for something fresh to preach. I will supply all the money that’s needed, both for the church and for your family, and you will never have a building large enough to contain the crowds I will send in response" (p.25). Reviewer’s Comment: Where in Scripture does one find this concept? That God has communicated audibly, in dreams and visions, through prophets and apostles, we are in agreement, but this "inner voice" is not to be found. Even the Vineyard theologian Jack Deere claims that the concept of God guiding through promptings, impressions, and insights has no biblical base. He says, "The word ‘prompt’ never appears in Scripture with God as the subject. [We are being] asked to believe in a form of guidance that can’t even be found in the Bible" (Surprised by the Voice of God, pp.283,284). When men like Deere can poke holes in our understanding of revelation, we had better take a second look. Azusa Street Cymbala sees the Pentecostal "tragedy" of Azusa Street (1906) as an example of the outpouring of God’s Spirit. He even quotes William Seymour, the guiding light of Azusa Street, as saying, "We are measuring everything by the Word" (p.117). Reviewer’s Comment: Something is seriously wrong if we accept this statement at face value. Those who know the history of Azusa Street, Pentecostalism, and the theology of Seymour, should be repulsed by such a comment, for Seymour and his followers, obviously were not measuring everything with Scripture. And the Pentecostal church that sprang from their teachings is full of theological error. Power Evangelism One of the most disturbing elements of this book is an apparent acceptance of "power evangelism" (a Vineyard doctrine). Cymbala writes,
Following quotes from Acts concerning signs, wonders and healings, Cymbala writes "Message plus divine demonstration. Doctrine plus power. This is the New Testament way" (p.146). "The teaching of sound doctrine is a prelude, if you will, to the supernatural" (p.151). Reviewer’s Comment: This is almost straight John Wimber. Had the IFCA quoted Wimber’s Power Evangelism with favor, most would be up in arms. Here is Wimber’s definition of "Power Evangelism."
The only difference I can discern between Wimber and Cymbala’s views is that Wimber’s are more familiar than Cymbala’s. Revival and Finneyism While the Charismatic teachings alone render this book hopelessly flawed, there is more. For example, Cymbala promotes the currently popular and highly unbiblical view of revival as per Charles Finney style. Finney, who did more to cheapen evangelism than any one individual I can think of, is apparently Cymbala’s greatest hero, and is often quoted (e.g. p.58, p.115, and pp.174ff). Finney, the 19th Century evangelist and theologian, was the well-known author of "means" or special methods that he believed could produce conversions, as well as revival. All the church needed to do, so taught Finney, was to use the right means and the results were guaranteed, with or without help from the Holy Spirit. His evangelistic inventions are legion and lethal. Even prayer was seen as a "means" to an end (see p.58). God could be manipulated to send revival if only the church prayed hard enough. Evidence of Finneyism is rampant in evangelism today. Finney and his views need to be exposed, not endorsed. Study the history of revivals and you will find that they are sovereign outpourings of God’s blessings, not dependent in any way upon our methods. The oft-stated comment that prayer has been the catalyst for all past revivals is just not historically accurate. Ian Murray’s out-standing Revival & Revivalism concludes: "No human endeavours can ensure or guarantee results. There is sovereignty in all God’s actions. He has never promised to bless in proportion to the activity of His people. Evangelism This volume makes unbiblical and intimidating claims for the results of evangelism. Using Pentecost as our apparent example he asks, "Are we bringing thousands of men and women to Christ the way Peter did? If not, we need to get back to his power source" (p.97). Reviewer’s Comment: To my knowledge Peter, nor any of the other apostles, ever again had such a reception to their preaching of the Word. As a matter of fact on some occasions the gospel was rejected by most, the apostles imprisoned, the church scattered. Yet Cymbala assures us that, "When we sincerely turn to God, we will find that His church always moves forward, not backward" (p.97). I do not believe that this claim can be substantiated either in Scripture or church history. False Claims for Prayer As important as prayer is, and who wants to say anything against prayer, I nevertheless question whether the Bible reduces virtually the whole Christian life down to this one element. While many of Cymbala’s comments seem to make sense, far too often they do not have the backing of Scripture. For example, he writes: "No matter what I preach or what we claim to believe in our heads, the future will depend upon our times of prayer" (p.27). This sounds good, but what in Scripture teaches this? Arminianism When it comes to conversion, Cymbala takes the Arminian – "sealing the deal" as soon as possible position. We dare not allow someone to go home and think about the gospel, read the Scriptures, or give the Holy Spirit time to bring forth true spiritual birth (p. 126). Again, it is Finney not Scripture that guides the author’s philosophy of ministry. Conclusion While there are certainly bright spots and good comments in Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire, I believe it to be a largely unbiblical, charismatic, mystical approach to Christian living. That the IFCA could endorse it, without so much as a warning, is beyond my understanding. In fairness to the IFCA, when I sent an abbreviated form of this book review to both the director, Richard Gregory and the president, Donald Fredericks, I received somewhat encouraging responses. Gregory wrote, in part,
While admitting a mistake, Gregory also seemed to imply that I was being over cautious. As the review above indicates, I do not believe that I over-reacted. Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire opens a door in a direction that the IFCA surely does not want to go, it includes some false winds and strange fires. Are we so desperate to have a "fresh freeing of the Spirit" that we are compelled to turn to largely unbiblical, quasi-charismatic, mystical approaches to Christian living? Fredricks wrote me a kind letter of appreciation, but it was muted by the admission that he had not even read that issue of Voice, which had been published over a year before. Nevertheless, upon my request, Gregory was willing to let me write, and publish in the Voice, Jan/Feb 1999, a short review of Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire. For this I am thankful and anxiously await reaction. For information on:
|







